翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Los Angeles Times Book Prize ・ Los Angeles Times Building ・ Los Angeles Times Festival of Books ・ Los Angeles Times Grand Prix ・ Los Angeles Times Magazine ・ Los Angeles Times suburban sections ・ Los Angeles Times Syndicate ・ Los Angeles Times v. Free Republic ・ Los Angeles Times Women of the Year Silver Cup ・ Los Angeles Tofu Festival ・ Los Angeles Trade–Technical College ・ Los Angeles Tribune ・ Los Angeles Unified School District ・ Los Angeles Unity ・ Los Angeles Urban Debate League ・ Los Angeles v. Patel ・ Los Angeles Vale F.C. ・ Los Angeles Valley College ・ Los Angeles Vanguard ・ Los Angeles Virtuosi Orchestra ・ Los Angeles White Sox ・ Los Angeles Wildcats ・ Los Angeles Wolves ・ Los Angeles Women's Championship ・ Los Angeles Women's Music Festival ・ Los Angeles World Airports ・ Los Angeles Xtreme ・ Los Angeles XXIII Olympiad dollar ・ Los Angeles Zoo ・ Los Angeles, Bohol Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Los Angeles v. Patel ： ウィキペディア英語版 Los Angeles v. Patel ''Los Angeles v. Patel'', , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Los Angeles law, Municipal Code § 41.49, requiring hotel operators to retain records about guests for a ninety-day period is facially unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it does not allow for pre-compliance review.〔(City of Los Angeles v. Patel: ''SCOTUSblog'' ), SCOTUSblog.com, n.d. (last viewed July 13, 2015); ''(City of Los Angeles v. Patel )'', No. 13-1175, 576 U.S. ____, slip op. (2015) (hereinafter cited as ''Patel'').〕 == Background == Los Angeles, in their city code,〔Los Angeles, Cal. Municipal Code § 41.49 (hereinafter cited as LAMC).〕 required hotels to keep certain specified information about their customers, including the name and address, vehicle information, dates of the stay, room number, and how the customer paid the bill, among other information.〔''Patel'', at *5-6; (City of Los Angeles v. Patel article ), The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law (last visited June 24, 2015) (hereinafter cited as Oyez Project).〕 The hotel had to keep the information for 90-days, and if a police officer requested the information, the hotel had to make it available or face criminal penalties.〔LAMC § 41.49(3)(a).〕 In 2003, Naranjibhai and Ramilaben Patel, and other hotel operators sued the city in the federal district court alleging that the ordinance violated the Fourth Amendment.〔''Patel'', at *7; Oyez Project.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Los Angeles v. Patel」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.